Archives For Web

Smart TVs are making a lot of the headlines this week, but a company called MultiTouch has a different genre of screens on display, and they are wicked cool. The MultiTouch Displays are similar to the Microsoft Surface technology that was all the rage a few years back, and to the HP TouchSmart product that Dave got a chance to play with at CES 2009. However, the displays from MultiTouch are modular, meaning you can connect multiple screens together; they’ve been implemented all over the world in tables and walls; and the platform is open so developers can create their own applications for the touchscreen interface. And oh, what a touchscreen interface it is.

The applications on display in the MultiTouch booth include a Twitter wall, a photo table, and a table application that was created for Dom Perignon with interactive champagne bubbles, a customized menu, and even table games. The company says it also has the technology deployed in medical, military, museum, and university environments, among others. The screens support an unlimited number of touch points from fingertips, to 2D markers, to household objects like coins. And because the platform is open, the possible applications are virtually limitless.

At CES, MultiTouch has announced the next-gen version of its platform and dubbed the technology MultiTaction.  The resulting displays are thinner, and scalable for screens ranging from “32 to 100 inches and beyond.” The company also says it will be ready to ship for the consumer market no later than Q3 of this year. The displays aren’t cheap, but at $4,000 a pop, they’re not out of reach for a certain slice of the population. And that’s the price this year. Surely eventually mass production will drive the price down further. Continue Reading…

The big TV manufacturers are all pushing 3D very hard, consumer sentiment be damned. But they’re also all getting on board with their own smart TV offerings, including services with app stores, and content that can be place-shifted to different devices. Yesterday Samsung and Panasonic both showed off their own TV app markets: Media Hub for Samsung, and Viera Connect for Panasonic. Samsung is touting TV episodes that can be accessed from mobile Galaxy devices, as well as an app ecosystem that it’s currently building out with developers. Panasonic showcased apps for Hulu Plus, MLB, BodyMedia, Skype, Facebook, Twitter, Withings, and Ustream during its event.

As the TV manufacturers jump into the app space, how will it change the landscape for both pay-TV operators and over-the-top box companies? (Not to mention the likes of Yahoo…) It will be interesting to watch.

I don’t know what it is about Yahoo, but every year at CES, one of us here at ZNF seems to get sucked in by the promise of Yahoo’s TV platform. In 2011, everybody and their mother is touting a smart TV or a web-connected TV box. Yahoo has been having this conversation for years, and despite little buzz, it seems to keep chugging along. New this year is a technology called “broadcast interactivity,” which shows up as a smart bar at the bottom of your screen and pastes content on top of broadcast and on-demand shows based on audio signatures it “hears” in the programming you watch. The smart bar includes content like TV trivia, polls, and links to buy stuff you see on the screen with your TV remote. (Jennifer Aniston’s sweater, anyone?) You can get the widget on any Yahoo-supported TV, or by connecting an upcoming retail D-Link box to your non-web-based TV screen. Yahoo is working directly with broadcasters to generate the content, with partners right now including ABC, CBS, Showtime, and the Home Shopping Network.

Now wait, I can hear you scoffing at this obvious move by networks to shove more marketing in front of us. But before you do, consider a few things. First, kids will go mad for this. A chance to interact with content around Barbie, iCarly, or whatever the latest craze is? I know my five-year-old would eat it up. Second, think about MTV pop-up videos or American Idol polls that let you text in your votes. People love’em. Third, do not underestimate the power of home shopping. The masses throng to it.

Most interesting to me is the fact that Yahoo is working on a solution that will appeal to consumers, with content closely tied to the programming people want to watch, and to content providers, who have major financial incentive to get something like this working. Yahoo is also working deals with advertisers (Ford, Microsoft, Mattel) to generate enhanced/interactive commercials. Looks like an interesting route around EBIF to me. Continue Reading…

While light on details, Sony has announced that their Dash widget station will see a refresh this summer. All we know at this point is that there will be two editions, in multiple colors, with one SKU receiving the oft requested internal rechargeable battery. Presumably, it’ll also feature a more sprightly experience via upgraded screen and additional processing power. We kinda like the existing 7″ Sony Dash, which sports Chumby apps and Sony’s Bravia content streaming (now including Hulu Plus playback), and feel it’s favorably priced at a new low of $149.

“Transportability was the next logical step in the evolution of our Sony Dash product line,” said Brennan Mullin, senior vice president of Sony’s personal imaging and audio business. “With a battery, consumers have the freedom to bring Dash from room to room in their home, experiencing the benefits of glanceable, real-time tidbits of information in new and exciting ways.”

We’re still about 36 hours from Microsoft’s CES keynote. Yet the Seattle Times looks to have stolen a bit of CEO Steve Ballmer’s connected home thunder:

Microsoft’s going to make a splash in this market with a stripped-down version of Windows tailored for set-top boxes and connected TVs. The software is a version of its embedded device software, overlaid with the Windows Media Center interface, with media streaming and remote-control capabilities.

This doesn’t come as an entire surprise, and was alluded to last spring. Yet, it’s been a long time since we’ve seen any new Media Center extenders (beyond the Xbox) and Microsoft’s been conspicuously absent from the small form factor set-top play… somewhat surprising their long history in this space.

In fact, this isn’t first time MS has attempted to port the Media Center experience onto a consumer electronic device – as they tried to take on TiVo in 2005/2006 with the LG DVR pictured above. Hopefully this latest foray into the living room fares better. The market is ready, assuming they can successfully execute and offer something compelling/competitive. However, I’ve said it before and I’ll probably keep on saying it, MS is best served by more tightly integrating their properties and initiatives, such as Mediaroom and Media Center.

(via Business Insider)

A Big 2011 for Jinni?

Dave Zatz —  December 30, 2010

We’ve been following the Jinni content recommendation service for nearly two years, beginning with Davis’ glowing review. Based on their 2011 goals below, they obviously intend to break free of the web browser:

  • JinniTV – a new guide which will enable online users to enjoy the Jinni experience through remote-control access to their connected living room
  • Jinni mobile – our mobile app (available first on iPhone) which will provide 3 guide services in one simple user interface for content discovery of TV shows and movies over-the-top, in theaters and within the home
  • A personalized remote-control for the iPad aficionado for pay-TV operators
  • A touch-screen kiosk for DVD/Blu-Ray discovery within retail stores

Mari caught wind of their strategy earlier this year at a CableLabs winter conference, where Jinni was recognized with the Best Product Idea.

The idea is to create a better VOD experience, and Jinni says it expects to announce operator deployments of an EBIF version of the app later this year

Of course, breaking into the MSO space with Internet-sourced content is easier said than done. And perhaps why Jinni missed their 2010 target and is now emphasizing a “connected living room” in 2011. Jinni would make a mighty fine Roku or Yahoo TV widget. Even better if it could link directly into other apps, like Vudu, Netflix, or Amazon VOD, with suggestions. However, it appears their strategy is multifaceted as they haven’t entirely given up on “pay-TV operators.” Regardless of direction(s), we dig their product and intent – and wish them the best in the new year.

If you’re an Android user and have been dying to try out the new Xfinity app, you’re wait is over. Comcast released the app for the Android platform this week, complete with email inbox, digital voice account access, TV listings, on-demand menus, and access to your myDVR Manager app.

The new Android implementation is solid, and a good way to get a handle on all of your Comcastic services, particularly if you’re a triple-play subscriber. I don’t have digital voice service, so I can’t evaluate that component, but if you use the SmartZone software Comcast already offers online, it doesn’t look like the set-up here is much different, and Will Richmond over at Video Nuze has good things to say about how voicemail and email are integrated.

Email should also look very familiar to any subscribers who have used Comcast webmail. The Xfinity app adds in an alert icon that shows up as an envelope with a glowing red aura whenever a new message comes in. I can’t decide if it’s cool or annoying, but in any case, it’s easy to switch on or off in the settings menu.

The TV and on-demand listings are the best part of the app. While the iPad version is great at home, having access to TV info on the phone I always have with me is more practical. The interface lets you scroll through content chronologically or by category (including HD), and the integration with the MyDVR app is actually tighter than it is on the iPad. (There’s no exiting to a browser.) The on-demand section has several TV and movie clips, so if you’re bored, there’s always a short snippet to watch of whatever Comcast is highlighting in VOD. Hopefully Comcast will also make good in the near future on adding full-length videos to its mobile apps.

A major shift is taking place. The interwebs are now important enough for major content providers to start throwing their weight around online. Sure, they’ve been doing it to some extent over the last several years – networks keeping content off Hulu, broadcasters blocking video scrapers like RedLasso – but the studios are upping their game. The latest evidence is a report from Reuters that “senior executives at three of the big six television and movie studios” are looking to renegotiate their deals with Netflix. You know those 28-day DVD release windows before Netflix gets access to certain movies? The studios are looking at extending them further. And the money Netflix pays for digital rights to studio content? Increases are likely on the way. (Of course Netflix may be very willing to pay. There’s one report out that the streaming company would pay up to $100K per episode if it could get its hands on current TV line-ups.)

None of this is surprising. Just look at the retransmission wars taking place between TV networks and cable providers. As Netflix moves closer to that latter category, the company is going to start getting similar treatment. It’s just a distribution channel after all. And now that it’s a highly profitable one, the content companies are going to shorten their leashes.

There are other recent examples of networks putting pressure on digital distribution too. The limitations placed on the likes of Google TV and Boxee Box count as one example, but I also listened in at an industry event yesterday where it became clear that networks want to increase the ad loads for content online. Will Richmond of VideoNuze hosted the event with execs from MTV Networks, Comcast, and elsewhere, and one of the discussions centered on how much advertising consumers will tolerate online. The prevailing view seems to be that there’s still a lot of room for ad growth.

Don’t get me wrong – I do believe content producers and providers have a right to get paid for their work, and high-value content isn’t cheap to make. As a consumer, though, I can only sigh with resignation as I watch the online distribution channel evolve along the lines of traditional television, and hope that greed doesn’t push the pendulum too far.