For avid TV watchers, May is one of the best times of the years. The networks strut out their best quality stuff, there are plenty of cliff hangers, NBA finals (Go Lakers) and don’t even get me started on the season/series finales. It’d be nicer if we could just have fresh content all year round, but for whatever reason the networks want to make consumers gorge on television, just to take it all in for one month. At least there will be time for sunlight during summer reruns.
For advertisers and the studios though, May marks the start of a vicious frenzy of negotiations, where fortunes can be won and lost in a bizzarre game of chicken, that I’m not sure I’ll ever understand. Every year, we see the same dance, the studios unveil their A list stuff and the marketing agencies come drooling with their blank checkbooks.
Last year though, things didn’t go as smoothly as planned. Issues like DVR usage and streaming internet video started to creep into the negotiations. The marketing agencies demanded that they only pay for live viewers and the studios tried to convince them that DVRs were somehow actually good for them.
The truth was though, that the studios had lost control and eventually the ad agencies were able to negotiate rates on their terms, instead of having to cave to last minute pressure. With May sweeps about to start up all over again, you can bet that both sides are positioning themselves for how they plan on dealing with these irritating DVR owners.
To make matter worse, before the feeding frenzy can even start, Nielsen has added blood to the water by publishing their first guesstimates on the actual size of the DVR market.
Before this, it had been thought that DVRs were in 15.8% of households, but Nielsen thinks that the actual DVR market penetration rate is closer to 17.2%.
As a huge fan of DVR technology, I can’t say that I’m surprised. The technology really is that powerful. Somehow I don’t see DVRs becoming any less popular, so I think it’s safe to say, that at least within the near future, 1 out of 5 households are going to have the power to take back control of their television experience. The studios will try argue that not everyone wants to be a power ad zapper, but lets not kid ourselves, these are just negotiation tactics, the real value of the 30 second spot is no longer close to what it once was.
I’m sure that the studios aren’t happy about DVR users, but I am glad that it is forcing them to innovate. I know that creative content owners can figure out a way to make good content and advertise even without 30 second ads. It’s time for the ad agencies to do what they do best and that is get creative so that they can make product placement a viable alternative to spasmatic interruptions during our programming.
Pretty soon the bidding war will begin, but if I was a marketing executive, I’m not sure that I’d be even buying 30 second spots to begin with, let alone paying for the 1 out of 5, who are just going to blast through your ads anyway. Negotiations will be tough this year, but as a bystander, they will be fun to watch.
Davis Freeberg is a technology enthusiast living in the Bay Area. He enjoys writing about movies, music, and the impact that digital technology is having on traditional media. You can read more of his coverage on technology at www.davisfreeberg.com.
I have had a dvr for several years and the fact is that the 30sec ad needs to be rethought, but not for the reason most often stated. Years ago marketing folks realized that anoying ads, louder than the programming, crappy viral tunes and other gimmicks got the users to pay attention. Well the DVR has fixed that problem. If an ad bothers me or insults my intelligence it’s gone; advertiser you just wasted money. However, if an ad is entertaining or informative I watch it, maybe more than once, sometimes I call my wife in to see something again.
CALL FOR ENTRIES
CREATIVE COMMERCIALS
Deadline: JULY 1, 2007 entry fee: $275
Submit online at http://www.lashortsfest.com
323-461-4400
The 11th annual Los Angeles International Short Film Festival is proud to announce the return of our creative commercial competition. Last years commercial competition was a big success- in all 53 of the finest commercials from top ad agencies around the world screened at the 2006 Festival. ADWEEK sponsored a panel discussion moderated by ADWEEKS creative editor Eleftheria Parpis that included creative directors, commercial directors and producers discussing the possibilities and pitfalls found in advertising today. The winner of the competition was Love Story??? submitted by ad agency: The Furnace / Client: Herringbone.
The deadline for entry is July 1, 2007. Entry fee is $275 and the entry form and submission guidelines are available online at http://www.lashortsfest.com
Commercials are short films in their own right and should be looked upon not only as a selling mechanism, but as works of art and be recognized and awarded as such!??? Robert Arentz, Executive Director, LA Shorts Fest
About Us
LA Shorts Fest is the largest short film festival in the world. The Festival is accredited by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. Festival winners in the primary categories are eligible for Academy nomination. The festival boasts an outstanding past record of 25 Academy Award-nominated films, including the last 8 Oscar winners. Through a variety of yearlong activities, LA Shorts Fest educates, entertains and honors those who have mastered the craft. The Festival has honored some of Hollywoods legends of the past: Charles Chaplin, Harold Lloyd, and Robert Wise; along with actors Martin Landau, James Woods, Gary Oldman and directors Jan de Bont, Tim Burton, Bryan Singer and Paul Haggis. The Festival annually attracts more than 10,000 moviegoers, filmmakers and entertainment executives looking for the hottest new talent as well as brand name sponsors looking to connect with the trendsetters in Hollywood.